<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State of the Cloud – February 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jackofallclouds.com/2010/02/state-of-the-cloud-february-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jackofallclouds.com/2010/02/state-of-the-cloud-february-2010/</link>
	<description>Cloud Computing analysis and commentary from Guy Rosen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:52:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guy Rosen</title>
		<link>http://www.jackofallclouds.com/2010/02/state-of-the-cloud-february-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1234</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Rosen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 22:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackofallclouds.com/?p=556#comment-1234</guid>
		<description>Terremark weren&#039;t showing up as of a few months ago, but I&#039;ll be revisiting them soon to see if that has changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terremark weren&#8217;t showing up as of a few months ago, but I&#8217;ll be revisiting them soon to see if that has changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.jackofallclouds.com/2010/02/state-of-the-cloud-february-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1233</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 20:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackofallclouds.com/?p=556#comment-1233</guid>
		<description>Guy,

Out of curiosity, is Terremark not on the list because you weren&#039;t tracking them or because they just aren&#039;t showing up in the top 500k? Trying to decide who to go with for some services.

thanks

-DM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guy,</p>
<p>Out of curiosity, is Terremark not on the list because you weren&#8217;t tracking them or because they just aren&#8217;t showing up in the top 500k? Trying to decide who to go with for some services.</p>
<p>thanks</p>
<p>-DM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: State of the Cloud – May 2010 :: Jack of all Clouds :: Guy Rosen on Cloud Computing</title>
		<link>http://www.jackofallclouds.com/2010/02/state-of-the-cloud-february-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>State of the Cloud – May 2010 :: Jack of all Clouds :: Guy Rosen on Cloud Computing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 20:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackofallclouds.com/?p=556#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>[...] Let&#8217;s take a look at cloud providers from another angle. We last did this back in February. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Let&#8217;s take a look at cloud providers from another angle. We last did this back in February. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://www.jackofallclouds.com/2010/02/state-of-the-cloud-february-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackofallclouds.com/?p=556#comment-812</guid>
		<description>Guy thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guy thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Rosen</title>
		<link>http://www.jackofallclouds.com/2010/02/state-of-the-cloud-february-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Rosen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackofallclouds.com/?p=556#comment-803</guid>
		<description>@Arthur - last I checked, Terremark vCloud-based offering was still in its infancy. Officially it&#039;s all still a beta. In terms of the report at least, there wasn&#039;t much data to go on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Arthur &#8211; last I checked, Terremark vCloud-based offering was still in its infancy. Officially it&#8217;s all still a beta. In terms of the report at least, there wasn&#8217;t much data to go on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://www.jackofallclouds.com/2010/02/state-of-the-cloud-february-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackofallclouds.com/?p=556#comment-800</guid>
		<description>Guy,

Out of curiosity, is Terremark not on the list because you weren&#039;t tracking them or because they just aren&#039;t showing up in the top 500k? Trying to decide who to go with for some services.

thanks

-DM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guy,</p>
<p>Out of curiosity, is Terremark not on the list because you weren&#8217;t tracking them or because they just aren&#8217;t showing up in the top 500k? Trying to decide who to go with for some services.</p>
<p>thanks</p>
<p>-DM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
